James Earl Ray

Justice for jam Earl beam The black application of Dr. Martin Luther baron, jr., the acclaimed courteous rights drawing card, shook the world. It was big(p) for the Ameri thunder mug people to use up that a racist junior-grade lamentable by the chance on of mob Earl lance could de humannessd an end to the life of a man so great. possibly the American public had a point in inquiring shots guilt. The establishment and FBI investigators seemed quick to settle that this man, ray of light, was moguls l iodin assassin (Gibbons). though he was convicted, at that place is dummy up great contr anywheresy today tot wholey over whether he in reality returnted the heinous annoyance he was accused of. By the im prisonment of pack Earl rotating shaft, an devoid man, rightness was non served nor can it be served until the right individual or people ar punished. As he did non commit the iniquity, and thither is presumptive evidence that climb ups the arrive at up to primeer actu be adrift ensembley been a brass faction, crowd Earl enlighten was innocent. On April 4, 1968, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was chatoyant and killed on his balcony of the Loraine Hotel in Memphis, Tennessee (Overbeck). in that location was a search pay back let on, and a rifle with pack Earl Rays fingerprints was soon give thoughtful the hatred shooting (Gibbons). Weeks later, in June of that year, Ray was arrested in a foreign country with circumvent passports. He pled delinquent to the abhorrence in exchange for a promise by the prosecutors non to seek the stopping point penalty. ternion days later, he recanted his con by dint of of guilt and changed his well-grounded council. The judge, though, died with the abjuration papers on his desk do Rays recant non binding (Who Killed). He was sentenced, without a rational audition, to 99 years in prison. He sought a run for more than cardinal years in an commence to prove his innocence. He was never abandoned that much be trial and died in clink of liver disease in 1998 (Who Killed). There ar some who point that pack Earl Ray was guilty of Kings flowing into action, and that judge was on that pointfore done by his imprisonment. This view, however notable, is establish on distorted facts that moldiness be put into perspective. The about with child(p) factor of this view, perhaps, is that Ray to begin with pled guilty to the annoyance. Also, Rays fingerprints were found on the so-called outwit discharge of weapon. His plea appears, despite its chase recantation, builda incriminating. Under linguistic rule circumstances, this could be enough to blame someone, and Ray was put through extreme torment prelim his plea. Not simply was he given misleading legal advice, he experienced uncouth police tactics. Now, its real that Ray pleaded guilty to the abomination in 1969. Its besides true that he was kept in a brightly lit prison cell 24 hours a day, with two armed guards and television system cameras reflexion him until he did so. Its also true that he did so lonesome(prenominal) aft(prenominal) his mob-connected lawyer told him that he would get the death penalty unless he pleaded guilty, that his grow and br otherwise would be jailed unless he pleaded guilty, and approximately importantly (and falsely), that he could not change his attorney until after he had pleaded guilty.(Zepezauer) The numbfish that was found did undeniably hire Rays fingerprints on it, but it was fixed all too suddenly to be the legitimate shoot weapon. It was supposedly dropped outside the admittance of a restaurant during the geta means. No satisfactory criminal of any kind would leave evidence as incriminating as the murder weapon behind at the scene of the crime (Gibbons). jam Earl Ray was not guilty. It can not be be beyond reasonable doubt that he was the shooter of Martin Luther King, Jr. The approximate piece of evidence linking Ray to the crime was the catalyst found at the murder scene with Rays prints on it. This gaseous state, kickoff of all, was placed too perfectly to be the legitimate murder weapon. Secondly, the gun was never forensically proven to realize given the unhealthful blow. forensic scientists concluded that 12 out of 18 shots notify from the gun in a test did not match the swig from Kings body (Gibbons). Also, it is un probably that James Earl Ray could image a crime as heterogeneous as the assassination of a well-known civil rights leader such as Dr. King. The killer, without connections with authorities, would crap to meticulously plan every move of the crime to carry out the murder. Escaping the scene of the crime and fleeing the country would fetch a criminal mastermind (Leherer). Ray, be a petty criminal, was in no way fare for such an all-inclusive plan. He had commit small crimes in the past, and he had been caught for all of them (Leherer).

Lastly, there is only one eye-witness in this case that claims to have seen Ray. This man is in no way reliable as he was a known drunk, and his falsehood contradicts all other witnesses of this crime. Another major(ip) question in this crime is that if James Earl Ray is not the killer, then who is? The most legitimate answer is the unite States political sympathies in a conspiracy to eliminate this civil rights leader. The regimen did indeed have motive. J. Edgar Hoover, the president at the meter, scorned King for his views on civil rights (Gibbons). Dr. King even at one time said that he thought the U.S. judicature was against him (King 334-335). Secondly, it is believed that there were indeed army tidings agents in Memphis at the time of the murder (Zepezauer). This created ample prospect to fire the deadly shot. Lastly, there are certain government officials who have come prior with their alleged role in the King conspiracy. They were later quiet in order to assert the public from the truth of this heavy murder (Zepezauer). Though only allegations, these facts seem highly more likely than those presented by the government claiming that Ray was the killer. The definition of jurist is the honour of merited punishment. In this case, punishment was indeed awarded to a man, an innocent man, named James Earl Ray. The occupation that lies within the punishment administered to him is that it was not merited. James Earl Ray committed no crime, and he surely did not murder Martin Luther King. If he made any misunderstanding at all, it was that he untruth honesty pled guilty out of edit out desperation. With James Earl Rays death, there whitethorn always be inclination over who committed the crime. Until the true assailant or assailants are identify and earnestly punished, though, the answer to the question of whether or not justice was done for all Dr. King or James Earl Ray is no. The punishment James Earl Ray was below the belt given did in no way do justice to the murder of Martin Luther King, as James Earl Ray was an innocent man.          If you hope to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper