Grading

Grading Rubric for Non-Profit Case The following rubric lead be used for the evaluation of team intromissions (in class and last-place indite analysis) of your nonprofit studys. Note that the component aras of a thoroughgoing(a) plate presentation are listed on the left column, and levels of effect are listed across. This listing can help you better develop your case analysis and presentation. Evaluation criteria are listed for both the centre presentation and the process aspects (e.g., teamwork, presentation style). |Component |Unacceptable (C) | bankable (B- to B) | costly (B+) |Excellent (A- to A) | |External analysis  | trammel | 3-4 outside | 5-6 factors, | 7-10 factors, expound| |(description of external change drivers: |discussion of |factors identified and| depict with |with colligate example s, | |political, economic, demographic, |external factors |described with |examples, related to |prioritized relevant to | |technological, social, legal, etc.) |(1-2, poorly |examples |organisational events|the firm | | |described, no | |and performance | | | |examples) | | | | |Internal analysis | limited | 2-3 factors | 4-5 described, | 6+ described, | |(description of functional departments & |discussion of |described, with |with examples |prioritized, s how general| |relationships: finance, mark! eting, R&D, |internal factors (1|examples |reflecting key |connections | |manufacturing, HR, etc.) |described, no | |processes |...If you want to work a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper