Impact of Organizational Support for Career Development

travel victimisation inter issue Emerald bind The daze of shapingal place upright for c atomic number 18er ontogeny on rush happiness Belinda Renee Barnett, Lisa Bradley Article knowledge To cite this enrolment Belinda Renee Barnett, Lisa Bradley, (2007),The pertain of brass s electroshock therapyional nurse for locomote victimization on rush gratification, everyday spirit Development internationalist, Vol. 12 Iss 7 pp. 617 636 imperishable assort to this account http//dx. doi. org/10. 108/13620430710834396 D let blind drunk on 18-09-2012 References This document contains references to 40 a nonher(prenominal) documents Citations This document has been cited by 17 other documents To copy this document email&160protected com This document has been transfered 7990 measure outs since 2007. * Users who d suffer nettled this Article besides d stimulateloaded * Jyotsna Bhatnagar, (2007),Talent prudence schema of employee controlment in Indian ITES emplo yees gravest iodine to re gotion, Employee Relations, Vol. 29 Iss 6 pp. 640 663 http//dx. doi. org/10. 1108/01425450710826122 autonomic nervous system De Vos, Koen Dewettinck, Dirk Buyens, (2008),To propel or non to move? The family mingled with travel charge and preferred flight moves, Employee Relations, Vol. 30 Iss 2 pp. 156 175 http//dx. doi. org/10. 1108/01425450810843348 Marilyn Clarke, Marg bet Patrickson, (2008),The tonic coven ant of employability, Employee Relations, Vol. 30 Iss 2 pp. 121 141 http//dx. doi. org/10. 1108/01425450810843320 Access to this document was grant finished an Emerald subscription invite upd by UNIVERSITY OF GUJRAT For Authors If you would like to put out for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service.Information intimately how to strike which publication to write for and submission claimlines be available for every last(predicate). Please visit www. emeraldinsight. com/authors for to a great outcome(prenominal) information. About Emerald www. emeraldinsight. com With over forty long epoch see, Emerald assort publish is a give waying nonsymbiotic publisher of global seek with imp exertion in business, society, public policy and didactics. In tally, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and to a greater terminus than 130 harbor series, as easily as an crosswise-the-board regorge of online products and services. Emerald is both(prenominal) COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant.The organization is a married mortal of the Committee on generalation morals (COPE) and to a fault wagers with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. *Related content and download information correct at cartridge clip of download. The up-to-date issue and full textbook archive of this journal is available at www. emeraldinsight. com/1362-0436. htm The intrusion of organisational bear out for passage knowledge on calling triumph Belinda Renee Barnett Queensland Rail, Sandgate, Australia, and funding for passage instruction 617 Received declination 2006 Revised July 2007 Accepted August 2007Lisa Bradley crop of Management, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Abstract Purpose The purpose of this withdraw was to psychoanalyse the birth amidst organisational backup man for passage growing (OSCD) and employees flight ecstasy. establish on an elongate pose of fri polely cognitive occupational group theory (SCCT) and an combinatory exemplar of proactive conducts, the moot proposed that flight charge deportments would inter interfere the kin surrounded by OSCD and flight rejoicing, and among proactive spirit and locomote merriment.Design/methodology/approach Public and private orbit employees (N ? 90) dynamic in public life education activities realised a survey regarding their proactivity, OSCD, calling heed conducts and passage enjoyment. Findings OSCD, p roactive temper and line of succeedment commission behaviours were all dictatorially cerebrate to line of achievement contentment and public life instruction behaviours negociate the alliance amidst proactive temperament and travel satisf consummation. There was no relief for the life instruction behaviours mediating among OSCD and travel contentment. interrogation leapingations/implications This report card renderd reenforcement for the across-the-board SCCT instance by scrutiny a subset of its proposed familys employ a cross-section(a) approach. The sample surveyed (employees participating in life phylogeny activities) and the whopping comparison of full- du ration employees, whitethorn fructify the generalisability of the ? ndings. Future longitudinal enquiry could to a greater extent than fully test the guides proposed by the extended SCCT pretense and include a greater representation of part- duration and workaday employees. opera ble implications The results suggest that there argon bene? s for organisations and unmarrieds investment funds funds in life exploitation.. First, from an organisational aspect, investing in OSCD whitethorn lift employees charge rejoicing. Second, employees whitethorn enhance their own course gaiety by participating in public life anxiety behaviours. Originality/value This story integrated the bodeions of ii poseurs (an extension of SCCT and a mold of proactive behaviours) to test the in? uence of surroundingsal (OSCD) and private difference (proactive constitution) variables on move enjoyment. Exploring how organisational and various(prenominal) variables together in? ence biography joy provides a much eased approach to abstractive development. Keywords passage blessedness, Human resource perplexity, Employee development, C atomic number 18er vigilance Paper type Research writing Changes in the economic, technological and business surround dur ing the last both decades rescue signi? stoptly force heaps charge attitudes and escorts (Hall, 2002 Pinnington and Lafferty, 2003). These surroundal tilts pass water supplyd to the C beer Development multinational Vol. 12 no. 7, 2007 pp. 617-636 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 1362-0436 DOI 10. 1108/13620430710834396CDI 12,7 618 establishment of a new mental contract the mutual obligations held by employees and employers (Hall, 2002). The predominance of organisational restructuring, de-layering and downsizing has consecrated to a much ? exible or boundaryless vocation environment with expectations that idiosyncratics allow for self-manage their callings, preferably than cuss on organisational flush (Arthur et al. , 2005 Kossek et al. , 1998). Con soon, strict labour markets in Australia and other developed countries dispute organisations in keep backing, motivating and retaining employees.Australia is currently experiencing record dispirited unemploy rates with labour shortages across umpteen a(prenominal) industries, including the trades, engineering and knowledge sectors. In this competitory environment, where it is increasingly dif? cult and costly to displume employees with the necessary skills, organisations contend to convince employees that their organisation provides more opportunities, challenges and rewards than their competitors. This find tolerate be particularly challenging when the traditional rewards offered as part of the old psychological contract, much(prenominal) as structured passage course of actions and crease stability, atomic number 18 more dif? ult for organisations to provide due to the more dynamic environment in which many organisations now operate. Therefore, organisations be seeking creative counsellings to court this attraction, motivation and retention challenge (Erdogan et al. , 2004 Heslin, 2005). adept way that organisations may meet this challenge is to fill-in employees t o develop their own moves and increase their go cheer. This approach is ordered with the testimony that organisations perform a new strengthenerive, rather than guiding, case in enabling their employees travel advantage (Baruch, 2006).This subject proposes that organisations net squeeze strategies to enhance employees flight felicity and so potentially increase the organisations ability to attract and retain these employees. small-arm one con cen clipimeimeimeimere of this development is on the occasion that organisational support batch play in employees life ecstasy, it is of the essence(predicate) to in any case consider the fibre that unmarrieds play in their own flight winner, particularly devoted the trend towards more case-by-caseistic calling worry in the last few decades (Baruch, 2006).Exploring the intrusion that organisational and several(prenominal) difference variables generate on life story gratification go forth result in a mor e all-around(prenominal) examination taking into custody of these familys and alike offers the opportunity to merge the both, practicablely distinct perspectives provided by ( pass oner- thinked) vocational psychological science and (employer guidanceed) organisational psychology ( bring and Brown, 2006). An extended form of kind cognitive locomote theory (SCCT) has belatedly been proposed which omens how contextual and single constitution, cognitive and behavioral variables predict vocational propitiation ( add, 2004, 2005 Lent and Brown, 2006).To date, versions of this extended forge assume unless examined the academician rejoicing of college savants (Lent et al. , 2005) and there is a strong need for that believe with employed workers (Lent and Brown, 2006). Therefore, this ask conk seek the kin mingled with an environmental support variable, organisational support for vocation development (OSCD) and employee life history delight.In addition, a mediating human kindred proposed by SCCT, via booking in close draw a bead oned activities ( idiosyncratic life history counsel behaviours) will be seekd. Since this belatedly extended sit around of SCCT emphasises an approach to amalgamate spirit and environmental perspectives, previous studies of university students tried how extroversion and positive affect ? t the beat (Lent et al. , 2005). The current reflect builds on last(prenominal) interrogation by exploring how whatsoever other important nature variable (proactive spirit) bushels vocation propitiation.By incorporating the predictions of the good example of proactive behaviours (Crant, 2000), and the extended SCCT model (Lent and Brown, 2006), this exact will overly search whether life history trouble behaviours mediate the relationship amidst proactive spirit and race satisfaction. Greater understanding about the mediating mechanisms by which environmental and temperament variables ad join life history satisfaction will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of biography satisfaction and support the development and scrutiny of the extended SCCT model.Organisational life history perplexity is a risk solicitude process (Baruch, 2006). Therefore, examining the relation constituent that OSCD makes to employee locomote satisfaction back tooth assist organisations in determining whether investment in back up employee passage development will derive adequate bene? ts and enable organisations to better design rush development strategies to secure desired outcomes. From an employee perspective, understanding how personality, behavioral and environmental calculates execute together may offer the opportunity to assist slew to become as satis? d with their occupational groups as nature and environmental factors support (Lent and Brown, 2006). approach pattern 1 presents a companionable cognitive model aimed at understanding vocational and ed ucational satisfaction (Lent and Brown, 2006). The model predicts paths by which social cognitive variables (e. g. self-ef? cacy, endings) function jointly with personality and environmental variables to impact work satisfaction (Lent and Brown, 2006). The model extends upon SCCT, which was originally developed to explain pertain development, choice and surgery in biography and educational domains (Lent et al. , 1994).Exploration of this of late developed model of SCCT can contribute to the literary works by patroning to hand integration on 2 aims (Lent and Brown, 2006). These aims of contribution will be described next. substitute for life development 619 contrive 1. A process model of work satisfaction that highlights theorized interrelations among personality, cognitive, behavioural and environmental variables CDI 12,7 620 The ? rst way that this model of SCCT can contribute to the literature is to help unify the often disparate perspectives of organisational and vocational psychology (Lent and Brown, 2006). eon organisational and vocational psychology investigateers focus on work satisfaction, it is often with contrasting perspectives. For example, vocational psychology tends to be all the way think on the individual and work satisfaction is treated as an end in itself, or as a component of work adjustment (Lent and Brown, 2006 Russell, 1991). Organisational psychology, alternatively, tends to focus more on the organisational consequences of work satisfaction, much(prenominal) as productivity, lock inment and turnover (Lent and Brown, 2006).These differing perspectives project got led to largely distinct literatures, with concerns that researchers will reinvent aras of inquiry if they do non draw together learning from binary even offs (Baruch, 2006 Lent and Brown, 2006 Russell, 1991) Therefore, exploring this extended SCCT model can contribute to the literature by growth closer links between vocational and organisational psy chology perspectives on work satisfaction (Lent and Brown, 2006).Exploring this SCCT model can also contribute to building a more comprehensive understanding of work satisfaction by considering how cognitive, behavioural, personality and environmental factors jointly impact work satisfaction (Lent and Brown, 2006). By incorporating oftentimes studied correlates of work satisfaction into a few, broader conceptual categories, this extended model of SCCT attempts to balance comprehensiveness and simplicity in explaining the aggregate in? uences on work satisfaction.While the bivariate relations contained in this model take a shit authoritative take in, this extended model of SCCT provides a theoretical logic for predicting how these variables may function together. Since train of the extended SCCT model has foc utilise on student samples to date (Lent et al. , 2005), this current admit will also contribute to the literature by exploring how a subset of the relationships proposed by this SCCT model applies to employed workers, as recommended by Lent and Brown (2006).This study also incorporates theoretical predictions from the model of proactive behaviours (Crant, 2000) from the vigilance literature. This model considers the antecedents (individual differences, such(prenominal) as proactive personality, and contextual factors, such as OSCD) and consequences (such as move triumph) of both general and context-speci? c proactive behaviours (Crant, 2000). The model shares similarities with SCCT, in its perspective that employees bring an active determination in their races they initiate behaviours and create favourable places to achieve personal goals and line of achievement achiever (Crant, 2000).Similar to the predictions of SCCT (Lent, 2005), the model proposes that people are more probable to take actions to achieve their goals if they confine entry to environmental (organisational) support and resources relevant to the interest of these goals. Integrating the predictions from the psychological and managerial literature also builds on the recommendations of (Baruch, 2006) who urged researchers to analyse passages from a broad, multi-disciplined approach, rather than from a limited, single discipline perspective. The key elements of the model proposed in this study and its predicted pathways will be described next.The model outlined in Figure 2 integrates some of the predictions of the extended SCCT model (Lent and Brown, 2006) and the proactive behaviour model when applied to the vocation domain (Crant, 2000). The key layeres of variables that comprise this model include course satisfaction OSCD organisational support for charge development proactive personality and biography prudence behaviours. uphold for move development 621 Figure 2. Integrated model of proactive behaviours Key model elements life story satisfaction ( indispensable flight triumph) While traditionally a rush was considered to be con? ed t o professed(prenominal)s or those who advanced by dint of organisational hierarchies, today the term life story is more broadly applied and is comm however considered to be the lifelong sequence of economic consumption- relate follow outs of individuals (Hall, 2002). Building on this de? nition, travel achiever can be de? ned as the positive psychological and work- relate outcomes collect as a result of ones work attends (Seibert and Kraimer, 2001, p. 2). Distinction has been do between accusive and native indicators of passage supremacy.Objective life story mastery refers to the work experience outcomes, such as status, promotions and salary, that are acc utilizely observable (Seibert and Kraimer, 2001). Traditional travel research foc utilise predominantly on purpose measures of vocation winner (Gattiker and Larwood, 1988). This focus was logical with the predominance of hierarchical organisations where employees charge success was largely de? ned by promo tion, rank and retention (Hall and Chandler, 2005). Measuring only impersonal criteria of career success, however, is de? ient, since people also value unverifiable outcomes such as development of new skills, work-life balance, challenge and purpose (Gattiker and Larwood, 1988 Heslin, 2005). Also, having achieved objective career success does non necessarily cockeyed that people are satis? ed with their career (Hall, 2002). Lastly, some objective career success measures appear less relevant today, since organisations are more constrained in providing these opportunities (Heslin, 2005). nonpareil way to deal with the limitations of de? ning and touchstone career success using objective criteria is to accompaniment these with measures of immanent career success.Subjective career success Subjective career success refers to individuals paygrade of their career move on, accomplishments and anticipated outcomes, relative to their own goals and aspirations (Seibert and Kraimer, 20 01). The budge in focus to subjective career success, where the criterion for success is intimate rather than external, is also consistent with the change in the career context where individuals are expect to self-manage their own careers rather than rely on organisational direction (Hall and Chandler, 2005 Hall and Mirvis, 1995). CDI 12,7 622Subjective career success has some often been operationalised as job satisfaction or career satisfaction (Erdogan et al. , 2004 Heslin, 2003 Ng et al. , 2005 Seibert and Kraimer, 2001). For example, in a novel polish up of career success studies, 20 out of a match of 49 studies operationalising subjective career success included measures of career satisfaction and 11 studies included measures for job satisfaction (Arthur et al. , 2005). Alternatively, a youthful meta-analysis included only studies measuring career satisfaction to operationalise subjective career success (Ng et al. 2005). While there appears humble general consensus abo ut the relative merits of both measures, one perspective considers job satisfaction as an inadequate measure of career success, since subjective career success indicates satisfaction over a longer time frame and wider sick of outcomes, such as sense of purpose and work-life balance, than job satisfaction (Heslin, 2005). We will use career satisfaction in this study. charge satisfaction measures the extent to which individuals believe their career leave is consistent with their own goals, values and preferences (Erdogan et al. 2004 Heslin, 2003 Seibert and Kraimer, 2001). line of achievement satisfaction is often metrical using the career satisfaction scale developed by Greenhaus et al. (1990). The vast majority of studies measuring career satisfaction use this scale. For example, of the 20 studies measuring career satisfaction in the review article referred to to a higher place, 14 studies apply the career satisfaction scale (Arthur et al. , 2005) as we will do in the current research. Organisational support for career development Organisational support for areer development (OSCD) is also called organisational career direction or organisational sponsorship and refers to the programs, processes and assistance provided by organisations to support and enhance their employees career success (Ng et al. , 2005 Orpen, 1994). The variable has been so named in this study to be consistent with the new supportive and enabling image proposed for organisations, rather than the traditional command and mark approach taken in the past (Baruch, 2006).Referring to the extended SCCT model (Lent and Brown, 2006), OSCD belongs to a class of environmental support and resources variables that are speci? cally relevant to the pursuit of an individuals career goals. OSCD comprises nut strategies (including career planning, training and discernment centres) and informal support such as providing mentoring, coaching and networking opportunities (Hall, 2002 London, 1988 St urges, Guest, Conway, and Davey, 2002).proactive personality proactive personality or disposition is a steadfast individual difference construct that differentiates individuals base on the extent to which they take action to in? uence their environment. People with a proactive disposition tend to secern opportunities and act on them, persevering until ungenerousingful change occurs in their environment (Crant, 2000). Proactive personality has demo signi? set up positive relationships with career satisfaction and career management behaviours (Chiaburu et al. , 2006 Seibert et al. , 2001). move management behaviours Career management behaviours are the actions that individuals take to achieve their career goals. These behaviours occur when individuals demand to initiate and intervene in their career situation in such a way that the individual acts in a desired direction, rather than responding passively to an oblige change (Crant, 2000). These behaviours are referred to altern atively as career enhancing strategies (Nabi, 2003), context-speci? c proactive behaviours (Crant, 2000) and career goal-directed activities (Lent, 2004).These behaviours include career geographic expedition and planning, skills development, networking and promoting ones achievements (Claes and Ruiz-Quintamilla, 1998 Kossek et al. , 1998 Nabi, 2000, 2003 no(prenominal), 1996 Orpen, 1994). Pathways to career satisfaction The model outlined in Figure 2 proposes that contextual or environmental factors (such as OSCD) can in? uence the career satisfaction of employees by enhancing employees elaborateness in career management behaviours. The model also proposes that horse barn individual differences, such as proactive personality, also in? ences career satisfaction via career management behaviours people with a proactive disposition are more probably to engage in career management behaviours and be more satis? ed with their careers. Each of the paths proposed in the model will now be discussed. OSCD and career satisfaction A goal-speci? c environmental support and resource, such as OSCD, which provides social and material support for ones personal goals, is presumable to be a signi? slang forecaster of career satisfaction (Lent and Brown, 2006).Conversely, the absence of such supports, or strawman of contextual obstacles, is in all likelihood to impede goal come and reduce satisfaction. This direct link to career satisfaction is predicted in the extended model of SCCT (Lent and Brown, 2006), and in this studys model. To date, the evidence about the amount of dissension in career satisfaction explained by OSCD is blend (Ng et al. , 2005). This variability could partly be explained by the lack of observational research testing theoretical models that uniquely predict subjective career success (Ng et al. 2005 Seibert et al. , 2001 Wayne et al. , 1999). For example, many studies examining the in? uence of OSCD on career success make similar predictions for b oth objective and subjective career success and make for variables that carry a greater relationship with objective than with subjective career success. deficiency of research which makes this distinction is of particular concern, since upstart meta-analytic results suggest that there is a signi? pretense difference between the predictors of objective and subjective career success (Ng et al. , 2005). Speci? ally, OSCD (including career sponsorship, executive program support and training and development opportunities) and stable individual differences (such as proactive personality) were more strongly associate to career satisfaction than to salary and promotion, measures of objective career success (Ng et al. , 2005). patronage for the relationship between OSCD and career satisfaction was provided in two recent meta-analyses ( every last(predicate)en et al. , 2004 Ng et al. , 2005). Signi? sanctimoniousness positive relationships were put up between mentoring and employee career satisfaction, with resolution sizes ranging from 0. 1 to 0. 29 across up to ten studies ( on the wholeen et al. , 2004). Signi? cant encumbrance sizes ranging from 0. 38 to 0. 46 were also install between OSCD (career sponsorship, executive program support and training and development opportunities) and career satisfaction across up to 18 studies (Ng et al. , 2005). Analyses showed however, that the meta-analytic correlations between self-report measures were signi? cantly high than correlations between self-report and objective measures, suggesting that percept-percept bias may be in? ating these correlations (Ng et al. 2005). pay for career development 623 CDI 12,7 624 conduce support for a positive relationship between OSCD and employee career satisfaction was also anchor in two cross-sectional studies, comprising employees from private and public sector organisations in the United Kingdom and Israel (Orpen, 1994 Pazy, 1988). In both studies, the details develope d to represent characteristics of an forceive organisational career management system loaded on terce factors career management policies, employee career development and career information.Together, theoretical predictions and observational ? ndings forego to the studys ? rst guesswork H1. OSCD will be positively related to to career satisfaction. Career management behaviours and career satisfaction Participating in career management behaviours that are directed at achieving in person valued goals in the career domain are also expected to promote an individuals career satisfaction and success (Crant, 2000 Lent and Brown, 2006).Pursuing personally relevant goals is a key way that people can contribute to their own well universe and enables the exercise of personal billet in career satisfaction. To the extent that an individual can set and work towards their own goals and perceive that they are making progress, they are capable of promoting their own career satisfaction (Lent and Brown, 2006). Meta-analytic support also exists for the positive relationship between individual career management behaviours and career satisfaction (Ng et al. , 2005). Signi? cant effect sizes of 0. 33 and 0. 8 were set singly for career planning and employee networking behaviour on career satisfaction across up to eight studies (Ng et al. , 2005). While well-nigh studies exploring these relationships are cross-sectional, there is also support for the positive impact of career management behaviours on subjective career success iii historic period later (Wiese et al. , 2002). Wiese et al. (2002) surveyed 82 five- yr-old German adults (age range 28 to 39 years) employed in a range of professions including physicians, lawyers, scientists, bank employees, hotel managers and police of? ers The study mensural participants career management behaviours and their subjective success in the work domain (career satisfaction) at quantify 1 and three years later. Participants caree r management behaviours at eon 1 predicted 14 per cent of the mutant in participants career satisfaction three years later, after(prenominal) overbearing for career satisfaction at Time 1. Career management behaviours at Time 1 however, did non predict signi? cant extra dissonance in career satisfaction when career management behaviours at Time 2 were also considered.The predictions of SCCT and the model of proactive behaviours, supported by these meta-analytic and longitudinal results, lead to the studys abet supposal H2. Career management behaviours will be positively related to career satisfaction. Mediating role of career management behaviours between OSCD and career satisfaction The extended model of SCCT predicts that in addition to a direct relationship between OSCD (goal speci? c environmental resources) and career satisfaction, OSCD may also indirectly impact satisfaction via goal pursuit (career management behaviours) (Lent and Brown, 2006).The model of proactive behaviours also predicts that the heading of contextual factors, such as organisational support and resources, will advance an individuals proactive career behaviours and career success (Crant, 2000). While there is indirect support for the impact of OSCD on individual career management behaviours (Kossek et al. , 1998 Noe, 1996), empirical evidence for the mediating role of career management behaviours between OSCD and career satisfaction is limited (Nabi, 2003). For example, in two recent studies of university students conducted by the same research team (Lent et al. 2005), one study ensnare support for this mediating relationship, while the arcsecond study did not. In the ? rst study of 177 students, signi? cant relationships were open between environmental resources and academic goal progress and between goal progress and domain satisfaction for both the academic and social domain. In the second study of 299 students a strong predictive relationship was found between goal p rogress and satisfaction, but not between environmental support and goal progress (Lent et al. , 2005).Nevertheless, ground on the predictions of SCCT and the integrated model of proactive behaviour, it is expected that individuals will be more promising to take actions to achieve their career goals and career satisfaction if they surrender ingress to organisational (environmental) support and resources to pursue these goals (Crant, 2000 Lent, 2005). This leads to the ternary meditation H3. Career management behaviours will mediate the relationship between OSCD and career satisfaction. Proactive personality and career satisfaction match to the model of proactive behaviour (Crant, 2000), an individuals disposition or personality will also in? ence the extent to which they take the initiative to engage in career management behaviours and achieve career satisfaction. Therefore, this suggests that individuals with proactive dispositions are more likely to engage in career managem ent behaviours and experience greater career satisfaction than individuals with lower proactive tendencies. A recent meta-analysis found that proactive personality was strongly related to career satisfaction with an effect size of 0. 38 found across three studies with over 1,000 participants (Ng et al. 2005). Signi? cant relationships between proactive personality, career management behaviours and career satisfaction were also show in a longitudinal study, which will be outlined next. A study analyze the career behaviours and strategies of 496 full-time employees found that proactive personality explained superfluous variance in career satisfaction, after controlling for some(prenominal) demographic, adult male capital, organisational, motivational and industry variables (Seibert et al. , 1999).Two years later, the researchers found that the relationship between proactive personality and career satisfaction was negociate by innovation, political knowledge and career management behaviours (de? ned as career initiative) (Seibert et al. , 2001a). While the recently extended SCCT model does not refer to proactive personality speci? cally, it does predict that personality and affective traits will impact satisfaction directly as well as via cognitive appraisals of self-ef? cacy and environmental supports (Lent and Brown, 2006).An additional theoretical pathway suggested is that certain personality traits may affect satisfaction through behavioural intend the example apt(p) suggests that passing conscientious workers may be more likely to set, pursue and make progress towards personal goals (Lent and Brown, 2006). Similarly, it follows that highly proactive workers may be more likely to engage in career management behaviours to achieve career goals and satisfaction. The similar Support for career development 625 CDI 12,7 predictions of SCCT and the proactive behaviour model, supported by meta-analytic and longitudinal results, lead to the following hypothese s H4.Proactive personality will be positively related to career satisfaction H5. Career management behaviours will mediate the relationship between proactive personality and career satisfaction. 626 Control variables To more befittingly determine the unique in? uence of OSCD and proactive personality on career satisfaction, the study will also control for human capital variables (organisational elevate and education take aim), which adjudge been found to be related to career satisfaction (Ng et al. , 2005 Seibert and Kraimer, 2001 Wayne et al. 1999). The study will explore the in? uence that environmental and individual variables (OSCD, proactive personality and career management behaviours) can provide to employee career satisfaction and examine the mechanisms by which these relationships operate. This study thusly builds on recommendations to contribute a more balanced, collective perspective to the study of careers (Baruch, 2006 Lent and Brown, 2006). method Sample The part icipants were 90 employees from a range of private and public sector organisations.A questionnaire was substituted by 77 public sector employees and 21 postgraduate business students. eighter of the postgraduate students describe that they were currently unemployed, so they were removed from the analysis, leaving a total of 90 respondents. Of the remaining respondents, 64 per cent were female. The majority of respondents were aged between 31 and 50 years (72 per cent), with 17 per cent under 30 years and 11 per cent aged over 51 years. Most of the respondents (53 per cent) were employed with their current organisation less than ? e years, with 14 per cent having organisational tenure of vi to ten years and 33 per cent over 11 years. Most of the respondents (93 per cent) were employed full-time, with 56 per cent employed in administrative and professional roles, and 40 per cent in a managerial capacity. educational activityal aim was high, with 86 per cent of respondents having have a go at itd either undergrad or postgraduate tertiary study. Measures only the study variable scales were heedful on a ? ve-point scale which ranged from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5).Scores were reversed such that higher scores re? ected higher standing on the construct measure. All the scores for each of the items were averaged to scram an boilersuit measure for each of the variables. Organisational support for career development Respondents rated a ten-item organisational career management scale (Sturges et al. , 2002), indicating the extent to which they perceived OSCD. five-spot of the items were modi? ed slightly to re? ect a more supportive, rather than directive organisational relationship with employees. In a previous study (Sturges et al. 2002), six of the ten items loaded on formal OSCD (e. g. I have been given work which has developed my skills for the futurity) and four items loaded on informal OSCD (e. g. I have been encouraged to obtain a m entor to help my career development). In the previous longitudinal study, the formal OSCD subscale achieved an inside accordance dependableness of 0. 77 at both time 1 and time 2, one year apart and the informal OSCD subscale achieved an inbred concurrence dependableness of 0. 80 at time 1 and 0. 81 at time 2 (Sturges et al. , 2002).Refer to fudge I for the internal congruity reliabilities for all the current study variables. Proactive personality Proactive personality was rateed with a ten-item shortened version of Bateman and Crants (1993) 17-item Proactive Personality scale. Seibert et al. (1999) presented evidence of the severeness and reliability of the shortened scale, with the scale having demonstrated an internal consistency reliability of 0. 85 (Seibert et al. , 2001a). Respondents indicated their level of agreement with each of the statements (e. g. I am constantly on the guide for new ways to improve my life).Career management behaviours Since the authors rese arch did not identify one scale that examined as comprehensive a range of career management behaviours as desired, items from two scales were used. The ? rst scale measured career planning using six items developed by Gould (1979). This scale has demonstrated internal consistency reliability above 0. 7 in previous studies (Gould, 1979 Wayne et al. , 1999). Participants reported the extent to which they had career goals and plans (e. g. I have a strategy for achieving my career goals). collar items were stated in the opposite direction and were reverse scored.The second scale measured career self-management behaviours using 16 items (Sturges et al. , 2002). Respondents indicated the extent to which they engaged in networking (e. g. I have arranged to be introduced to people who can in? uence my career), visibleness behaviour (e. g. I have made my direct supervisor aware of my accomplishments), skills development (e. g. I have read work-related publications in my trim time) and mo bility-oriented behaviour (e. g. I have made plans to leave this organisation if it cannot offer me a rewarding career). intrinsic consistency correlations above 0. were achieved for all of these subscales in a previous study (networking (0. 74), visibility (0. 69-0. 8) and mobility (0. 76-0. 78)), except for skills development (0. 56-0. 63) (Sturges et al. , 2002). Career satisfaction Career satisfaction was measured using the ? ve-item career satisfaction scale, which has demonstrated an internal consistency correlation of 0. 86 (Greenhaus et al. , 1990). Respondents indicated their level of agreement with each of the statements (e. g. I am satis? ed with the progress I have made toward meeting my overall career goals).Control variables Respondents demographic and human capital information was collected with single item questions for gender, age, highest level of education terminate, organisational tenure, work type (e. g. technical, professional, managerial) and physical exerc ise status (full-time, part-time, casual). Support for career development 627 CDI 12,7 628 Variables 3. 65 3. 31 3. 52 3. 50 0. 08 0. 42 0. 22 20. 02 0. 16 20. 08 2 0. 28 0. 27 2 0. 08 0. 35 0. 15 0. 07 0. 02 2 0. 22 2 0. 17 0. 49 0. 77 0. 54 0. 72 table I. Correlations between variables of interest M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0. 5 2 0. 19 2 0. 18 2 0. 32 2 0. 22 2 0. 17 2 0. 03 (0. 86) 0. 04 0. 55 0. 23 (0. 90) 0. 16 0. 27 (0. 88) 0. 35 (0. 87) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Gender grow group Education level elevate Proactive personality OSCD Career management behaviours Career satisfaction Notes correlations greater than 0. 28 are signi? cant at p , 0. 01 those greater than 0. 21 are signi? cant at p , 0. 05 internal consistency reliability for variables shown in brackets () nominal or ordinal scales used to measure variable, therefore mean and stock deviation not reportProcedure Public sector employees participating in internal and cross-agency career development programs were invited to complete the questionnaire during workshops, while the postgraduate business students were invited to complete the questionnaire during university classes. (The authors approached these organisations and their respective employees/students because it was expected that they would be more interested in the studys variables of interest and subsequent results, and therefore, be more likely to participate in the study. Respondents were told that the aim of the survey was to research their career attitudes and perceptions about organisational career development. A cover garner provided background information regarding the purpose and nature of the study and emphasised con? dentiality, anonymity and voluntary participation. Participants either returned the questionnaire in an envelope at the end of the session or returned it in a reply-paid envelope addressed to the authors university address. To ensure anonymity, respondents were not asked to provide their names or any other identifying information.Participants were encouraged to participate by receiving a small incentive (such as a chocolate bar and/or being eligible to win a cinema/meal voucher). The vouchers were awarded at the end of workshops, during which participants were given time to complete the questionnaire. Respondents who returned a completed questionnaire at the end of the workshop receive a raf? e rag. A winning ticket was then drawn from the allurement of ticket butts, and the respondent with the matching ticket was given the voucher.These small incentives and the strategy used for approaching participating organisations may have resulted in the relatively high repartee rate of approximately 50 per cent. Results Means, standard deviations and internal reliability for the variables of interest are shown in Table I. An exploratory factor analysis showed that the formal and informal OSCD items loaded on one factor, accounting for 53 per cent of the variance in the factor struct ure. All the OSCD items were therefore averaged to form a composite OSCD score, with an internal consistency reliability of 0. 90.An exploratory factor analysis of the career management behaviours found that all items (except for the two mobility-oriented items and one networking item) loaded above 0. 30 on the ? rst factor, accounting for 30 per cent of the variance in the factor structure. A composite career management behaviour score was calculated by averaging all the items loading above 0. 30 on the ? rst factor, with an internal consistency reliability of 0. 88. The networking item and two mobility-oriented items were removed from further analyses. All the remaining scales obtained internal consistency reliability above 0. 5 (refer Table I). The public sector and postgraduate business student samples were analysed to determine differences on demographic variables. The only signi? cant differences were that the university respondents were less likely to be female (x 2 ? 1? ? 75 2, p , 001) and tended to be junior (x 2 ? 3? ? 1386, p , 001) than the public sector respondents. collectable to there being only small-scale differences, the two cohorts were combined into one sample. Support for career development 629 CDI 12,7 630 Hypothesis testing H1 to H5 were analysed by conducting hierarchical egression analyses on career satisfaction. The data were checked for miss data and outliers. One multivariate outlier was identi? ed and removed from the analysis. The number of control variables used in the regression analyses was contained to meet the recommended ratio of respondents to predictor variables (Tabachnick and Fidell, 1989). H1 and H2 proposed that OSCD and career management behaviours would both be positively related to career satisfaction. After controlling for education level and tenure, OSCD predicted an additional 8 per cent variance in career satisfaction (? 028, p , 001), F? 1 85? ? 757. Therefore, H1 was supported. H2 was also supported. Caree r management behaviours predicted an additional 9 per cent variance in career satisfaction, after controlling for education level and tenure (? ? 033, p , 001), F? 1 85? ? 897. H3 proposed that career management behaviours would mediate the relationship between OSCD and career satisfaction (refer Table II). The ? rst specification of mediation (as described by power and Kenny, 1986) requires that the case-by-case variable, OSCD, relate to the mediating variable, career management behaviours.In the ? rst compare (refer equivalence 1, Table II), OSCD was not signi? cantly related to career management behaviours (? ? 019, p ?. 005, ns). H1 represented the second peg down, which was met (refer equation 2, Table II), In the third equation, (refer equation 3, Table II), career satisfaction was regressed on the mediating variable (career management behaviours) along with the freelancer variable (OSCD). The effect of OSCD on career satisfaction remained signi? cant (? ? 023, p , 005) and career management behaviour was also signi? cantly related to career satisfaction (? 028, p , 005). For the third condition to be met, the effect of OSCD on career satisfaction would need to decrease signi? cantly. The ? rst and third conditions of mediation were not met, suggesting that career management behaviours do not mediate the relationship between OSCD and career satisfaction. Therefore H3 was not supported. H4 proposed that proactive personality would be positively related to career satisfaction. After entering the control variables (education level and tenure), proactive personality predicted 4 per cent additional variance in career satisfaction (? 021, p ? 005) F? 1 85? ? 383 (refer equation 2, Table III). Therefore, H4 was supported. bloodsucking variable First equation cosmic microwave background radiation Second equation CSat Third equation CSat b b b 0. 31 * * 20. 13 0. 11 * * 0. 19 0. 14 * * 0. 04 0. 10 20. 15 0. 05 0. 28 * * 0. 09 * * 0. 08 * * 0. 10 20. 15 0. 02 0. 23 * 0. 28 * 0. 14 * * 0. 14 * * Variable metre 1 Education level Tenure correct R 2 Step 2 OSCD Career management behaviours Adjusted R 2 DR 2 Table II. Mediating role of career management behaviours between OSCD and career satisfaction Notes *p , 0. 05 * *p , 0. 01 * * *p , 0. 01 Variable Step 1 Education level Tenure Adjusted R2 Step 2 Proactive personality Career management behaviours Adjusted R2 DR 2 reliant variable First equation cosmic background radiation Second equation CSat Third equation CSat b b b 0. 31 * * 20. 13 0. 11 * * 0. 53 * * * 0. 36 * * * 0. 25 * * * 0. 10 20. 15 0. 02 0. 21 0. 05 0. 04 0. 10 20. 15 0. 02 0. 06 0. 29 * 0. 09 * 0. 09 * Support for career development 631 Table III. Mediating role of career management behaviours between proactive personality and career satisfaction Notes p=0. 05 *p , 0. 05 * *p , 0. 01 * * *p , 0. 001H5 predicted that career management behaviours would mediate between proactive personality and career satisfaction. In the ? rst equation, proactive personality was a signi? cant predictor of career management behaviours (? ? 053, p , 0001) F? 1 85? ? 3498 (refer equation 1, Table III), meeting the ? rst condition. H4 represented the second condition of mediation which was also met. Both proactive personality and career management behaviours were entered in the third equation (refer equation 3, Table III). While career management behaviour was positively related to career satisfaction (? ? 029, p , 005) F? 2 84? 455, proactive personality was no longer statistically signi? cant (? ? 006, p . 005, ns), meeting the third condition, Moreover, the indirect path linking proactive personality and career satisfaction through career management behaviours was signi? cant (Sobel test, z ? 211, p , 005). This suggests that career management behaviours fully liaise the relationship between proactive personality and career satisfaction, providing support for H5. Discussion This study explored the contribution that organisations and employees can make to their career satisfaction and the mechanisms by which these relationships occur.This was achieved by testing a subset of the relationships proposed by an extended model of SCCT (Lent and Brown, 2006) and an integrative model of proactive career behaviours (Crant, 2000). The study explored how proactive personality, OSCD and individual career management behaviours relate to career satisfaction. consonant with previous research (Ng et al. , 2005 Seibert et al. , 2001a), this study found that proactive personality was signi? cantly positively related to career satisfaction. The study also found that career management behaviours mediated the relationship between proactive personality and career satisfaction.These results support the model of proactive behaviours, which suggests that highly proactive individuals are more likely to achieve greater career satisfaction than less proactively inclined individuals, by move in proactive career beha viours (Crant, 2000). The results also support the theoretical proposition by Lent and Brown (2006) that speci? c personality traits (proactive personality) impact satisfaction via behavioural essence (career management behaviours). CDI 12,7 632 After controlling for education level and tenure, OSCD explained a moderate 8 per cent variance in career satisfaction.This result supports the premise made by the extended SCCT model that access to goal-relevant environmental resources will be directly related to satisfaction (Lent and Brown, 2006). This ? nding also supports this studys proposal that organisations can in? uence their employees experience of career success by sustenance their employees career development. Individual career management behaviour (comprising career planning, networking, skills development and visibility) was also positively related to career satisfaction.After controlling for education level and tenure, individual career management behaviour explained 9 per cent additional variance in career satisfaction. This ? nding is consistent with SCCT and the model of proactive career behaviours, since it supports the proposal that individuals taking proactive actions to achieve their career goals (engaging in career management behaviours) are more likely to experience career satisfaction (Crant, 2000 Lent, 2005). The proposal that individual career management behaviours mediated the relationship between OSCD and career satisfaction received no support, due to a non-signi? ant relationship between OSCD and career management behaviours. This ? nding is inconsistent with the extended SCCT model, which predicts that environmental resources may impact satisfaction indirectly via their impact on goal-directed activities. The relationship between contextual factors, such as OSCD, and individual career management behaviours has received mixed empirical support. For example, Lent et al. (2005) found two different outcomes from their two different studie s. The ? rst study of 177 students found a signi? ant relationship between environmental supports and resources and student progress towards their academic goals. The second study of 299 students found no direct relationship between these variables. A possible explanation for this studys results is that individual difference variables, such as proactive personality, moderate the relationship between OSCD and career management behaviours. disposed that individuals with a proactive disposition are relatively unconstrained by situational forces (Crant, 2000) it is likely that highly proactive people will engage in career management behaviours independent of the OSCD they perceive.This study possibly suffered from a restriction of range in this independent variable, since the studys respondents (employees participating in career development programs and/or further study) are more likely to have highly proactive dispositions, and therefore engage in career management behaviours independ ent of their perceived OSCD. This explanation is supported moderately by the relatively high mean score for proactive personality (3. 65 on a ? ve-point scale).Another possible savvy for career management behaviours not mediating between OSCD and career satisfaction is that there are additional environmental supports and resources (such as those outside(a) the organisation), individual difference or social cognitive variables impacting individuals career management behaviours which were not explored in this study. Theoretical implications This study contributes to the living literature by exploring how environmental aspects (OSCD) and an individual difference variable (proactive personality) together impact career management behaviours and career satisfaction.Few studies have simultaneously investigated the impacts of these variables on career satisfaction before, and doing so responds to recommendations to balance both organisational and individual perspectives in theoretical d evelopment and facilitate integration of the organisational and vocational psychology perspectives (Baruch, 2006 Lent and Brown, 2006). This study builds on previous research which tested the extended SCCT model with university students (Lent et al. , 2005), by exploring the action of a subset of its proposed relationships with employed workers.This study also incorporated conceptual predictions and empirical ? ndings from the management literature (Seibert et al. , 2001a) to test the applicability of another(prenominal) personality variable, proactive personality, in the extended SCCT model. Previously, positive affect and extraversion have been tested in the SCCT model (Lent et al. , 2005). The ? nding that career management behaviours mediated the relationship between proactive personality and career satisfaction provides support for the extended SCCT models prediction that personality traits may affect satisfaction via behavioural means (Lent and Brown, 2006).Together with the signi? cant positive relationship between OSCD and career satisfaction, this study provides support for the application of some of the extended models proposed relationships to employed workers. The study also has practical implications, which will be reviewed next. Practical implications While causation can not be proven, this study suggests that employees proactive personality, via their career management behaviours, and OSCD are signi? cantly related to employee career satisfaction. This suggests two different strategies for organisations to facilitate employees career satisfaction.The ? rst strategy involves recruiting employees with proactive dispositions. While this may be more dif? cult given the tight labour market experienced currently in Australia, and many other countries, it may be possible in some countries or in some industries. The second strategy involves enhancing employees perceptions of OSCD by providing both formal programs and informal support for employee care er development. The signi? cant positive relationship between career management behaviours and career satisfaction suggests that individuals bene? personally from engaging in these behaviours. Therefore, this ? nding suggests that OSCD initiatives that promote the individual bene? ts associated with career management behaviours and encourage employees to engage in these behaviours, may experience most success in facilitating employee career satisfaction. news report limitations As with all cross-sectional studies, causality between OSCD and career satisfaction can not be proven. Questionnaires were completed at one point in time by respondents, so the results are also subject to parking lot method and common source bias.As discussed above, the sample surveyed (employees participating in career development activities) is likely to be more proactively inclined than the general population, which may have restricted the range of study and limit the generalisability of the results. A large proportion of the study respondents were educated to tertiary level and employed full-time, which may also limit the generalisability of the ? ndings, particularly given the increasing participation in part-time and casual employment in Australia. The use of the career satisfaction scale to measure subjective career success may be another limitation of the study.While this standardised scale is used widely and obtains acceptable levels of internal consistency (Greenhaus et al. , 1990), it may be a de? cient measure of the subjective career success construct. The career satisfaction Support for career development 633 CDI 12,7 scale includes items (such as satisfaction with income and cash advance goals) which may not be the most important criteria used by individuals to assess their career success (Heslin, 2005). Future research Future research could be conducted with a greater representation of part-time and casual employees, and with greater variability in individual differe nces, such as roactive personality. Exploration of the broader relationships proposed by SCCT on a longitudinal cornerstone could build our understanding of the nature of the relationships between individual differences, environmental, social cognitive and behavioural predictors of subjective career success. Future research could also explore the types of career management behaviours that are most valuable for. achieving important career outcomes for employees. Greater understanding of these relationships could lead to the design of interventions that better facilitate employees experience of career success.Conclusion This study proposed that organisations may potentially attract, motivate and retain employees by supporting their employees career development. The results indicated that OSCD and employee participation in career management behaviours are positively related to employee career satisfaction. These results suggest that OSCD initiatives promoting the bene? ts associated w ith career management behaviours and supporting employees to participate in these behaviours may experience the most success in facilitating employee career satisfaction. References Allen, T. D. , Eby, L.T. , Poteet, M. L. , Lentz, E. and Lima, L. (2004), Career bene? ts associated with mentoring for proteges a meta-analysis, daybook of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 127-35. Arthur, M. B. , Khapova, S. N. and Wilderom, C. P. M. (2005), Career success in a boundaryless career world, journal of organizational Behavior, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 177-202. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986), The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations, daybook of Personality and Soclal Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 1173-82. Baruch, Y. (2006), Career development in organizations and beyond balancing traditional and contemporaneous viewpoints, Human vision Management Review, Vol. 16, pp. 125-38. Bateman, T. S. and Crant, J. M . (1993), The proactive component of organizational behavior, journal of Personality and Soclal Psychology, Vol. 14, pp. 103-18. Chiaburu, D. S. , Baker, V. L. and Pitariu, A. H. (2006), Beyond being proactive what (else) matters for career self-management behaviours? , Career Development International, Vol. 11 No. 7, pp. 619-32. Claes, R. nd Ruiz-Quintamilla, S. A. (1998), In? uences of too soon career experiences, occupational group and national culture on proactive career behaviour, Journal of vocational Behavior, Vol. 52, pp. 357-78. Crant, J. M. (2000), Proactive behavior in organizations, Journal of Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 435-62. Erdogan, B. , Kraimer, M. L. and Liden, R. C. (2004), Work value congruity and intrinsic career success the compensatory roles of leader-member tack and perceived organizational support, forcefulness Psychology, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 305-32. 634 Gattiker, U. E. nd Larwood, L. (1988), Predictors for managers career mobility, success, and satis faction, Human Relations, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 569-91. Gould, S. (1979), Characteristics of career planners in upwardly officious occupations, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 539-50. Greenhaus, J. H. , Parasuraman, S. J. and Wormley, W. M. (1990), Effects of race on organisational experiences, job instruction execution evaluations, and career outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, pp. 64-86. Hall, D. T. (2002), Careers In and extinct of Organisations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Hall, D. T. and Chandler, D. E. (2005), Psychological success when the career is a calling, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 155-76. Hall, D. T. and Mirvis, P. H. (1995), The new career contract developing the whole person at midlife and beyond, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 47, pp. 269-89. Heslin, P. A. (2003), Self- and other-referent criteria of career success, Journal of Career Assessment, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 262-86. Heslin, P. A. (2005), Conceptualizing an d evaluating career success, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 113-36. Kossek, E. E. , Roberts, K. , Fisher, S. and DeMarr, B. (1998), Career self-management a quasi-experimental assessment of the effect of a training intervention, force out Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 935-62. Lent, R. W. (2004), Toward a unifying theoretical and practical perspective on well-being and psychosocial adjustment, Journal of commission Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 482-509. Lent, R. W. (2005), A social cognitive view of career development and counseling, in Brown, S. D. E. L. and Lent, R. W. Eds), Career Development and guidance Putting Theory and Research to Work, John Wiley &038 Sons, Inc. , Hoboken, NJ, pp. 101-127). Lent, R. W. and Brown, S. D. (2006), Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction a social-cognitive view, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 69, pp. 236-47. Lent, R. W. , Brown, S. D. and Hackett, G. (1994), Toward a unifying social c ognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, Vol. 45, pp. 79-122. Lent, R. W. , Singley, D. , Sheu, H. -B. , Gainor, K. A. , Brenner, B.R. and Treistman, D. et al. (2005), Social cognitive predictors of domain and life satisfaction exploring the theoretical precursors of subjective well-being, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 429-42. London, M. (1988), Organizational support for employees career motivation a guide to human resource strategies in ever-changing business conditions, HR Human Resource Planning, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 23-32. Nabi, G. R. (2000), Motivational attributes and organizatonal experiences as predictors of career-enhancing strategies, Career Development International, Vol. No. 2, pp. 91-8. Nabi, G. R. (2003), Situational characteristics and subjective career success the mediating role of career-enhancing strategies, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 653-71. Ng, T. W. H. , Eby, L. T. , Sorensen, K. L. and Feldman, D. C. (2005), Predictors of objective and subjective career success a meta-analysis, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 58, pp. 367-408. Noe, R. A. (1996), Is career management related to employee development and performance?