What Difference Did the Renaissance Make to Medicine

What inequality did the Renaissance make to treat? The discoveries of the Renaissance didnt make a authoritative rest to medicament for legion(predicate) formers. The main efforts for this are that the discoveries do were originally some anatomy and physiology, not around cures and treatments, and that until now though stack had firen Galen to be wrong about several things, they tacit wouldnt let the four humours theory go. This meant that when superpower Charles II became pallid even the best physicians in the ground couldnt spell him which adept shows that treat didnt advance very much from the renaissance.The main reason that the renaissance didnt make a significant difference to medicine was that the discoveries made were primarily about anatomy, not about treatments and cures. For example, Vesalius dissected bodies and produced a book including pictures of the body drawn by renaissance artists. By doing these dissections and producing his book, he realised that Galen was wrong about several things. He proved that we exactly bedevil one jaw bone, not two as Galen said, he corrected the scale of our skeleton and he proved that there were no holes in the centre of the heart and therefore Galens theory about the heart was wrong.Although Vesalius did all this, he had belt up only improved the anatomical reference knowledge he hadnt discovered any cures/treatments or anything about our physiology, rightful(prenominal) that Galen was wrong with his views about the heart. William Harvey also did a bit of dissection to prove his theory. He focused on the distribution of rake around the body. He discovered that blood flows only one way around the body, and that blood is reused and not constantly produced by the liver as Galen had suggested.He used many complex diagrams which, when combined with the invention of the printing press, became quickly distributed throughout the ground in the form of a book entitled An anatomical estimate of th e motion of the heart and blood in animals. Although this was an important discovery, it is still just about anatomy and physiology. Harvey didnt come up with any newborn treatments or cures during the Renaissance. As well as this, because they didnt have very good technology at the time, Harvey had no way of proving that we have capillaries and so some people still didnt believe what he said.Even though both Vesalius and Harvey had proven Galen to be wrong several times, the people still believed in the four humours theory which was really the underlying problem and the reason that renaissance didnt make a significant difference, and why medicine didnt develop during the renaissance. Its easy to see that medicine hadnt advanced very much and that the renaissance hadnt made a significant difference when you look at how they handle the plague and King Charles IIs illness.When the plague returned in 1665, they still had no idea that it was carried by fleas. They also still had no rea l treatments that worked against the plague. All they knew was that it was contagious. Although this was an good on their knowledge from the last plague in 1348, it was still not a significant advancement to medicine. Another example that the renaissance hadnt really made a difference was when King Charles II vaporize ill. It is thought, from the symptoms of the King, that he had suffered a stroke.The best doctors and physicians in the country tried to save him with treatments of Bezoars stones, blister agents over his head as well as bloodletting, purgatorial and vomiting based on the four humours theory. The king died within 4days later being treated by these doctors. Its thought that it probably would have been better if they had simply left the King alone because it seems that he suffered a stroke. This shows just how bad medicine still was and just how little difference the renaissance had made to medicine as the best doctors in the country couldnt save their King.In Concl usion, the discoveries of the Renaissance didnt make a significant difference to medicine for many reasons. The main reasons for this are that the discoveries made were primarily about anatomy and physiology, not about cures and treatments, and that even though people had proven Galen to be wrong about several things, they still wouldnt let the four humours theory go. This meant that when King Charles II became ill even the best physicians in the country couldnt save him which just shows that medicine didnt advance very much from the renaissance.