Theory paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Theory - Term Paper ExampleActivists in interlanded estateal associations seek to influence outcomes of insurance as well as change the terms and the quality of debate. The various attributes of networks constitute core network conception represented in Keck and Sikkink theory of supranational activism. one(a) of the key values to the theory is values, which motivate network actors to work together because of shared values or principle idea embedded in international human effectives laws. Keck and Sikkink works revolve around ideas or values to diffuse progressive ideas in order to aid institutionalize value in political process and bring government practice to comply with established norms. Network is made of various types of actors care international and domestic non-governmental organizations, private foundations, local movements, media, churches, intellectuals and parts of governmental apparatus and politicians. Hence, international and domestic NGOs frolic a significant role since they are characterized by coordination and cooperation between actors in the network and exchange information, services, resources and personnel department (Tang 229-230). Transnational human rights associations are capable of doing a lot in guaranteeing the protection of human rights. For instance, transnational human rights network participate in drafting international human rights laws, advocate and diffuse norms infixed in laws and promote socialization of norms in domestic politics. Moreover, transnational networks place human rights problems of a nation on the international agenda, legitimize and empower the claims of repressed groups in a country and mobilizes international public press against nations that violate the norms. Since most members in transnational activism networks have got no economic or military power, one may wonder how transnational activism accomplishes their task in a world filled with power struggles. First, actors in transnational activis m derive moral authority from the legitimacy inherent in international norms of human rights. Since ideas and norms have constructive power to define state identities and interests transnational activists use their persuasive power to enforce policy changes. Transnational activists are teachers of norms as well as authors of norms thus they persuade policy makers to change their minds regarding what is right and alter public perception of what governments do. Hence, transnational activism makes difference by standing on the right look and defining what is right (Tang 231-232). Nevertheless, moral power of transnational activists never guarantees moral success in real(a) political processes hence, members of the network of international activists employ sets of strategies to gain from strengths of norms in order to change certain human rights practices. Strategies for transnational activists on human rights fall in two categories semisoft politics and hard politics, with soft poli tics refereeing to strategies that depend on information and moral persuasion. Contract between domestic and international organizations, transnational activists uncover facts human rights violations within a country and circulate information regarding state repression unfamiliar to the outside world. These transnational activists of human rights then embark on campaigns that aim at shaming the international conjunction by exposing inconsistency of state behavior and values it claims to aspire. Transnational activists employ hard politics with congenital strategy in this area being leverage politics where network members